Doctrine that a state can refuse to recognize a federal law

Study for the GMAS 8th Grade Social Studies Test with focused flashcards and multiple choice questions complete with hints and explanations. Get ready to excel!

Multiple Choice

Doctrine that a state can refuse to recognize a federal law

Explanation:
Nullification is the idea that a state can refuse to recognize or enforce a federal law within its borders, arguing that the law is invalid or unconstitutional. This concept showed up in the early United States and led to the Nullification Crisis, when a state opposed federal tariffs and claimed they could strike them down locally. Because the prompt describes a doctrine that a state can refuse to recognize a federal law, this term fits exactly. The other options don’t capture that specific action: secession means breaking away from the United States entirely; states’ rights refers to the broader idea that states have powers, but doesn’t specify refusing to enforce federal laws; a platform is a political party’s list of goals, not a legal doctrine about enforcing laws.

Nullification is the idea that a state can refuse to recognize or enforce a federal law within its borders, arguing that the law is invalid or unconstitutional. This concept showed up in the early United States and led to the Nullification Crisis, when a state opposed federal tariffs and claimed they could strike them down locally. Because the prompt describes a doctrine that a state can refuse to recognize a federal law, this term fits exactly. The other options don’t capture that specific action: secession means breaking away from the United States entirely; states’ rights refers to the broader idea that states have powers, but doesn’t specify refusing to enforce federal laws; a platform is a political party’s list of goals, not a legal doctrine about enforcing laws.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy